General Discussion : What is considered a healthy population density?

I have conducted a general Spring driving survey of the local Kestrel population this March and have identified 34 individuals, 17 males and 17 females with 8 noted as pairs perched together. I have limited my survey to the northern section of the county consisting of about 125 miles of rural, zig-zaging backroads. Many of the sightings come in successive clusters over a distance of a mile or two in some of the better habitat.

 

At what levels or densities is a Kestral population considered “healthy?” Is there a quantification of individuals per square mile of habitat that is indicative of declining, stable or improving population levels?

 

By the way, I'm having trouble getting the data submission apps past my firewall on my computer, so I have yet to post these observations. It's a work in progress at the moment.

Comments:

Chris McClure's picture

Great question! Unfortunately, we can't judge whether a population is stable or declining based on density in a single year. We would either need multiple years of surveys to judge trends over time, or estimates of survival and reproductive rates. You can check out broad-scale trends here : http://kestrel.peregrinefund.org/index.php?action=decline

Regarding your firewall issue, if you email our software engineer, Paul Spurling (pspurling@peregrinefund.org), he should be able to help.

All the best,
Chris McClure

Posted in General Discussion by GallusEyes 8 years 1 month ago.

 

accipiter